Tag Archive | "dorm life"

A Scripps Single Life at Pomona

By Megan Petersen ‘15
Copy Editor

Christie Kweon welcomes guests with an offer to have a seat on her brand-new and incredibly comfortable couch. The Scripps College sophomore has ample space in her new room—plenty of room for all her usual dorm furniture plus the couch and a mini fridge—because she has her own room this year. But this luxury, not available to many sophomores, didn’t come without a price. Kweon and 22 other Scripps students landed single rooms this year by leaving Scripps altogether and moving to Pomona.

For several years Scripps has had problems with what many call a “housing crunch.” The College’s 2007 Strategic Plan outlines plans for growing the student body (currently just over 950) to 1,000 by 2017. The plan states that this can only happen if the student-faculty ratio and class size remain consistent and if endowment goes up, but the plan never specifically mentions new living spaces. Though a new dormitory is rumored to be in the planning stages, more first-years are living in “forced” doubles and triples (e.g. a room designed to be a single is now a double, a double is now a triple, etc.), more upperclassmen are sharing living spaces, and there are precious few suites and single rooms available, often going to juniors and seniors with higher room draw numbers.

And, now, there is spillover housing available on the third floor of Smiley Dormitory, smack in the middle of Pomona’s campus.

Though the third floor of Smiley is in some ways equipped specifically for Scripps students—they have their own Scripps Residential Advisor, for example—the dorm is still much different from what many Scripps students are used to. An average-looking Pomona dormitory, Smiley might be considered a far cry from their home campus, which Forbes ranked among the most beautiful campuses in the world in 2010. Additionally, Pomona’s housing isn’t segregated by sex, which one would think might bother Scripps students accustomed to their women’s-only living space.

But Maxine Yakobe (’14) and Natasha Kraus (’15) were both more concerned about living on the third floor of a building without air conditioning than the dorm’s aesthetics or the genders of its residents. Heat was among the first things Kraus mentioned when asked about living at Smiley, and Yakobe said she was sometimes unable to sleep on hot nights.

Despite her discomfort, this is Yakobe’s second year living at Smiley. “It has a really cool dynamic,” she said, because it feels like a bunch of students living in one big suite rather than a floor full of singles. “I’ve made lots of Pomona friends and really broadened my social group,” Yakobe said.

“It really brings you out of your bubble,” Kraus added. Both emphasized the convenience of being so close to Pomona’s Smith Campus Center, which holds the Coop Fountain and hosts parties such as Pub various events throughout the year. “I like the proximity to 5C social life,” Yakobe said.

Kweon, who lives just down the hall, also says she enjoys Smiley, but tries not to compare living at Pomona and living at Scripps. “Obviously these are two different colleges. If you’re going to compare, you’re going to have to highlight the negatives more than the positives.”

Though she has to leave the dorm early to make the trek up to her morning Core III class, Kweon says Smiley doesn’t inconvenience Scripps students as much as people might think. “There’s this perception at Scripps and Pomona that this is the worst dorm” or that people who live at Smiley are “trying to detach from Scripps,” which she asserts is untrue. Kweon works at the Sallie Tiernan Field House and also has three classes at Scripps this semester, and said that she often finds it convenient to spend time at Scripps between commitments, studying either in the Student Union or the Denison Library, and come back to Smiley at the end of the day.

Many Pomona students don’t have an opinion about the Scripps takeover of their living space. Antonela Miho, a Pomona sophomore who also lives in Smiley, was open to the idea of spillover students coming to her college. If another college needs extra living space, “we have it,” she said.

Other Pomona students are not so welcoming. “She doesn’t even go here”— one Pomona sophomore, who asked that he remain anonymous, referenced the movie “Mean Girls” to express his frustration at having been deferred housing last fall, thus not knowing where he’d be living until three days before move-in this August. “Why is their housing secured, while mine was in the wind?”

This is the second year that Pomona has set aside rooms for overflow Scripps students, and, with no new dorm in the foreseeable future, the third floor of Smiley may be Scripps territory for several more years to come.

Posted in Student Life, Volume XVI, Volume XVI, Issue 2Comments (0)

SAS Welcomes Students Back to Campus

By Mikayla Raymond ‘15
SAS Media Relations Chair

Hello Scripps Voice Readers! My name is Mikayla Raymond and I am this year’s SAS Media Relations Chair! It is my job to keep you all up to speed with what’s going on in SAS so that we can all participate and be aware of what’s going on in our community.

SAS training began a week before classes started, and during our numerous meetings with both the executive and programming branches, as well as Dean Lee and President Bettison-Varga, we were able to discuss (and occasionally argue about) our goals for the start of the semester and how best to implement these goals. One of our biggest goals is to increase our visibility on campus. The largest aspect of this change will be an overhaul of the SAS website. Over the summer, we began designing a more attractive, useful, and better organized website to help both SAS and the student body communicate, participate, and advertise events as well as to make necessary information for CLORGS and student leaders more readily available. The site still has a very long way to go, but we have made a lot of progress and expect to have things running soon. In conjunction, I am leading a WordPress tutorial for SAS officers so that the entire SAS team can upload important information online for your viewing pleasure. In the same publicity vein, we are currently working hard to create an enticing logo for use on the SAS Website, flyers for SAS events, and t-shirts. We are also working on building our Facebook presence so that students can engage with us easily. We are confident that these changes will begin to create a closer connection between students and SAS and help inform students about what we are currently doing on campus.

Another goal is to create a set of policies for the Student Union. We want to make the space as useful for Scripps Students as possible and are currently working out procedures for reserving the conference rooms. We also want CLORGs to have the option to reserve the entire Student Union space for community events.

Additionally, we are in the process of revamping the Hall Council system. We are reevaluating the existing structure and plan to make significant changes to create a more substantial role for these representatives on our campus and within SAS. The current structure of Hall Council is not facilitating the need for more student representation on SAS and more collaboration between SAS and Residential Life, Peer Mentors, Hall Directors, and RAs.

If you have been using your dorm kitchen, you likely noticed some new additions! Thanks to a generous gift from last year’s SAS, every dorm kitchen is now fully stocked and ready for you to use. These lovely tools include: toasters, hand mixers, vegetable peelers, can openers, pots and pans of all sizes, silverware, strainers, knives, and more. No more running over to GJW for a cupcake tin and then back to Dorsey for a spatula! Until next time, keep yourself informed by liking our Facebook page, and by looking out for signs about Hall Council and First-Year Rep elections! You can visit the SAS Facebook page here.

Posted in News, Volume XVI, Issue 1Comments (0)

cleaning-supplies1

Polished Sinks, Clean Carpets and Awkward Interactions

By Carolyn Angius ’13
Staff Writer

With dorms renowned for looking like palaces and perfectly manicured lawns and gardens, there is no denying that the employees of the Scripps grounds, facilities and maintenance departments are extremely important, active members of our community. In fact, I can guarantee I see more of maintenance department employees than I do of my professors, or even some of my closest friends, on any given day. The irony, however, is that this visibility does not correlate with any sort of relationship or closeness

I exchange the typical “Hi, how are you?” and “Have a great day!” daily with my dorm’s housecleaner and I often sheepishly apologize and thank as I tip-toe around a ground worker’s piles of raked debris along the walkway to Routt. While I appreciate all the hard work the maintenance and grounds departments expend to make our campus beautiful, and I by no means take for granted their dedication. I find myself feeling uncomfortable with my relationship with the people who work so hard to create an environment from which we all benefit.

Last Friday morning, my six suite-mates were all milling around our suite when our dorm’s housecleaner entered and began vacuuming our living room and cleaning our bathroom. She even took out our trash. A few of us who saw her picking up jumped in to help her pick up detritus from the floor and clear a path for the vacuum. All of us engaged in small talk, discussing fall break and our weekends for a few moments. Once she had left, however, leaving behind polished sinks and a clean carpet, my suite-mates and I discussed our discomfort with the cleaner’s responsibilities. None of us felt comfortable with allowing anyone outside of the suite to come in and clean up after us–we felt embarrassed, ashamed and apologetic. As 19 and 20 year olds, we felt shameful allowing—and indirectly employing—another human to clean up after our own messes.

I greatly appreciate all the work of our maintenance and grounds workers and I would love to speak with a worker about their perspective on our campus’ students. I wonder if our grounds and maintenance workers feel like valued members of the community, and if not, I want to discover and implement ways in which we can build relationships with the people that give so much to us. Lastly, in light of my experience in the suite, I would be extremely interested in finding out if there is a way to alleviate facilities workers from cleaning the suites and private bathrooms without compromising their pay or job security on campus.

Posted in Opinions & EditorialsComments (0)

Opening Up Debate on Scripps’ Closed Door Policy

Going to college, I had certain visions of what college parties would entail. I remember chanting, “Toga! Toga!” with my friends as we watched the Delta Tau Chi fraternity boys throw a party in Animal House. What struck me most about Animal House’s portrayal of college was the sense of community. Alcohol may have been the main event, but the sense of community grew around the parties. However, at Scripps, dorm community suffers due to the reinforcement of the closed door policy. For those who are not familiar with the alcohol policy, the Scripps Handbook states: “Possession and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages by those persons 21 years of age or older is permitted in individual student rooms as long as a) the door is closed b) there are eight or less people in the room c) the individual serving the alcohol does not consume alcohol.” The first question I asked myself after reading this policy was: why would Scripps provide alcohol for SARLO-

approved events while restricting
consumption in the dorms to such an
extent? The school is obviously not trying
to eliminate the drinking scene from
student life.
Then, I considered the liability issue.
Would Scripps want alcohol to be
readily accessible in dorms when there
are underage first-years, sophomores
and juniors also living there? Wouldn’t
that encourage underage drinking? After
considering the closed door policy, I
began to think about how having one’s
door closed not only encourages underage
drinking, but provides an unsettling
atmosphere for binge drinking.
If students of age were allowed to drink
in the halls and common rooms—which
Scripps currently prohibits in its alcohol
policy—then other students, those who
were underage, could at least partake in
the festivities and would not be alienated
from their peers by closed doors. Those
who are underage do not necessarily have
to partake in the drinking to participate
in get-togethers.
As long as the closed door policy
is enforced, a less social and more
destructive habit of quick drinks before
leaving the dorms will continue to be
the predominant drinking culture for
all students—underage or not. This only
leads to more binge drinking. During
the weekend, one will walk through halls
that look completely dark and deserted
while hearing a faint noise through the
walls, indicating some human presence.
Why not replace this policy with one that
encourages, not stifles, social interaction
between students of different ages and
social groups?
I would like to advocate for an open
door policy, one that no longer restricts
drinking to single rooms with eight or
less people, one that allows parties—if
not in the hallways, then at least in the
common living spaces. Scripps students
need to stop hiding behind closed doors
and meet the people with whom they live.
In the words of Dean Vernon Wormer
from Animal House, “The time has come
for someone to put his foot down. And
that foot is me.”
By Justine Desmond ‘13
Staff Writer

Going to college, I had certain visions of what college parties would entail. I remember chanting, “Toga! Toga!” with my friends as we watched the Delta Tau Chi fraternity boys throw a party in Animal House. What struck me most about Animal House’s portrayal of college was the sense of community. Alcohol may have been the main event, but the sense of community grew around the parties.

However, at Scripps, dorm community suffers due to the reinforcement of the closed door policy. For those who are not familiar with the alcohol policy, the Scripps Handbook states: “Possession and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages by those persons 21 years of age or older is permitted in individual student rooms as long as a) the door is closed b) there are eight or less people in the room c) the individual serving the alcohol does not consume alcohol.”

The first question I asked myself after reading this policy was: why would Scripps provide alcohol for SARLO-approved events while restricting consumption in the dorms to such an extent? The school is obviously not trying to eliminate the drinking scene from student life.

Then, I considered the liability issue. Would Scripps want alcohol to be readily accessible in dorms when there are underage first-years, sophomores and juniors also living there? Wouldn’t that encourage underage drinking? After considering the closed door policy, I began to think about how having one’s door closed not only encourages underage drinking, but provides an unsettling atmosphere for binge drinking.

If students of age were allowed to drink in the halls and common rooms—which Scripps currently prohibits in its alcohol policy—then other students, those who were underage, could at least partake in the festivities and would not be alienated from their peers by closed doors. Those who are underage do not necessarily have to partake in the drinking to participate in get-togethers.

As long as the closed door policy is enforced, a less social and more destructive habit of quick drinks before leaving the dorms will continue to be the predominant drinking culture for all students—underage or not. This only leads to more binge drinking. During the weekend, one will walk through halls that look completely dark and deserted while hearing a faint noise through the walls, indicating some human presence.

Why not replace this policy with one that encourages, not stifles, social interaction between students of different ages and social groups? I would like to advocate for an open door policy, one that no longer restricts drinking to single rooms with eight or less people, one that allows parties—if not in the hallways, then at least in the common living spaces. Scripps students need to stop hiding behind closed doors and meet the people with whom they live.

In the words of Dean Vernon Wormer from Animal House, “The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.”

Posted in Opinions & EditorialsComments (1)

Scripps’ Lack of Dorm Community

I wish I had been able to attend the
BeHeard forum on Oct. 27, because
reading the article about it made me
realize a lot of my own feelings about
Scripps. The idea of a perceived lack of
community at the college hit home with
me, and I couldn’t help but compare it to
my own high school experience.
After a miserable freshmen year at
my local high school, I attended a strict
and extremely rigorous boarding school
three hours from my home. A big issue
at this boarding school, although never
formally addressed by Student Council
or the Residence Life department, was
the collapse of the community on the
weekends, when over half the campus
elected to go home and nothing could get
them to stay. Students claimed weekends
on campus were “boring,” there was
“nothing to do” and cafeteria food on
weekends was insufferably bad (the last
claim was unfortunately very, very true).
This issue was never solved during my
time there, but it’s universally agreed
upon by alumna that the thing that kept
them at my school and gave them the
willpower to survive and graduate was
the school’s community.
You see, since the campus was most
alive on weekdays, the RAs took the
hint and made most of their community
building and student-bonding activities
fall on weeknights. Not a week went by
when my RA wouldn’t host a pancake
or grilled cheese night, and sometimes
she had crafts for us to do, or a movie to
watch for a break from the endless work.
One night, she set up a mini-bar, making
us delicious, nonalcoholic mixed drinks.
Of course, the strength of the community
depended on how committed your RA
was, and some wings were more fun to
live in than others.
As for housing, it wasn’t perfect, but
it lent itself much more to community
building. Each hall housed a balanced
mixture of every grade, and first-years
were neighbors both to other first-years
and upperclassmen. At the beginning of
the year, all of the first-years in a dorm
were introduced to one another, and the
entire hall later participated in a name-
learning icebreaker. Because of this, and
the extensive hall activities surrounding
me, I boasted close friends from every
grade level. As an upperclassman, friends
were generally placed in the same area
of the hall, and if not, they were at least
under the same roof, if that was what
they desired.
Because of this experience, living at
Scripps thus far has frustrated me. I live in
a secluded hall of first-years, some of whos
name I don’t even know—we were never
formally introduced. The upperclassmen?
I’ve never seen most of them, because,
again, we were never introduced, and
they have no reason to come down to
the “freshman ghetto.” While there have
been RA-sponsored events, it hasn’t been
to the extent where I feel welcome and
at home in my dorm. How does Scripps
expect us to build a community and
make friends when we aren’t so much
as introduced to our neighbors? How
are we supposed to seek help from and
bond with our upperclassmen when we’re
hidden from them in a dark corner at the
end of the hall?
My high school was far from perfect—
it drove me insane while I was a student
there. It’s only as an alum that I’ve realized
how strong the relationships I made there
are. There are certainly things that my
school could stand to learn from Scripps
as well. But I do think that Scripps could
learn from the way my school built
communities—after all, it was the only
reason we survived.
By Katie Evans ‘13
Staff Writer

I wish I had been able to attend the BeHeard forum on Oct. 27, because reading the article about it made me realize a lot of my own feelings about Scripps. The idea of a perceived lack of community at the college hit home with me, and I couldn’t help but compare it to my own high school experience. After a miserable freshmen year at my local high school, I attended a strict and extremely rigorous boarding school three hours from my home. A big issue at this boarding school, although never formally addressed by Student Council or the Residence Life department, was the collapse of the community on the weekends, when over half the campus elected to go home and nothing could get them to stay. Students claimed weekends on campus were “boring,” there was “nothing to do” and cafeteria food on weekends was insufferably bad (the last claim was unfortunately very, very true). This issue was never solved during my time there, but it’s universally agreed upon by alumna that the thing that kept them at my school and gave them the willpower to survive and graduate was the school’s community.

You see, since the campus was most alive on weekdays, the RAs took the hint and made most of their community building and student-bonding activities fall on weeknights. Not a week went by when my RA wouldn’t host a pancake or grilled cheese night, and sometimes she had crafts for us to do, or a movie to watch for a break from the endless work. One night, she set up a mini-bar, making us delicious, nonalcoholic mixed drinks.

Of course, the strength of the community depended on how committed your RA was, and some wings were more fun to live in than others.

As for housing, it wasn’t perfect, but it lent itself much more to community building. Each hall housed a balanced mixture of every grade, and first-years were neighbors both to other first-years and upperclassmen. At the beginning of the year, all of the first-years in a dorm were introduced to one another, and the entire hall later participated in a name-learning icebreaker. Because of this, and the extensive hall activities surrounding me, I boasted close friends from every grade level. As an upperclassman, friends were generally placed in the same area of the hall, and if not, they were at least under the same roof, if that was what they desired.

Because of this experience, living at Scripps thus far has frustrated me. I live in a secluded hall of first-years, some of whose names I don’t even know—we were never formally introduced. The upperclassmen? I’ve never seen most of them, because, again, we were never introduced, and they have no reason to come down to the “freshman ghetto.” While there have been RA-sponsored events, it hasn’t been to the extent where I feel welcome and at home in my dorm. How does Scripps expect us to build a community and make friends when we aren’t so much as introduced to our neighbors? How are we supposed to seek help from and bond with our upperclassmen when we’re hidden from them in a dark corner at the end of the hall?

My high school was far from perfect— it drove me insane while I was a student there. It’s only as an alum that I’ve realized how strong the relationships I made there are. There are certainly things that my school could stand to learn from Scripps as well. But I do think that Scripps could learn from the way my school built communities—after all, it was the only reason we survived.

Posted in Opinions & EditorialsComments (0)

Students Share Opinions on Dorm Life at BeHeard Forum

October’s BeHeard forum, held Oct. 27 at the Motley, focused on fostering community, improving dorm life and the creation of a student union. Scripps’ Associated Students (SAS) began discussion with the idea of a first-year only dorm. Reactions to this idea were mixed. Some students said they would like to be completely surrounded by other first-years, which could help build class unity. Others felt that a first-year dorm could become cliquish, or they had positive relationships with upper class women in their dorms as first-years. The dorms’ living rooms were also a topic of discussion. These rooms are used as quiet study spaces or places for group meetings. However, Scripps already has browsing rooms set aside as quiet study spaces, and living and recreation rooms are infrequently used as places for all dorm residents to socialize. As a way to open up living rooms so more people can use them, SAS plans to purchase more couches to fill the living rooms. As the evening progressed, students began to warm up, and ideas and opinions flowed.

One of the biggest concerns voiced at the forum was the sense of community at Scripps. As Beth Olesen (’10) put it, “every year, we are always concerned about a lack of community.” In the past, neither SAS nor the student body has been able to initiate a lasting and satisfactory solution to this percieved lack of community.

The idea of organizing dorms around a common theme or interest was presented as a way to build community. Many students, however, raised questions on how dorms were to be organized. Suggestions included substance-free, quiet study and loud dorms, or dorms organized by major and extracurricular interests. However, some students said they do not want to give up neighbors with diverse interests for a community based on such specific ones. Others expressed fear that a certain interest or community may be assigned to a dorm they do not wish to live in. “Students don’t have to sacrifice dorm choice for community,” Simrat Dugal (’10) said, “but they may have to sacrifice room choice.” Discussion also centered around the idea that students shouldn’t separate themselves into the more desirable single rooms; instead, living in groups of doubles in the same hall could foster a sense of community, as friends would be more likely to keep their doors open. Hannah Pickar (’11) also suggested that large groups of friends be able to draw into the same hall.

The creation of a student union is also in the works, but SAS is still searching for a location. Part of Denison’s basement, the offices in Vita Nova Hall and SARLO are all projected places for a space for students. SAS will send out surveys about these projected changes on campus before taking substantive action. The next BeHeard forum takes place Dec. 1 and will focus on enviromental issues at Scripps.

 

Posted in NewsComments (0)